Legs akimbo!

Right...

On Tuesday I make a silly remark that goes something like "oi, send us a picture of your legs."

To be honest I was expecting you to read it and go "what a load of old bollocks" but suddenly; "ping!"

One picture arrives and then another and another. I have the brave and shameless (and hot) snapping their legs and mailing the pictures to me.

Here is the first pair of legs that I think are very hot. There's bulk and definition and they're smooth.

What I also like is that the quads come to an end and join up with some high-definition "leg". Nice stuff.

These are next on the entry list.

Now not only does this person have really fit legs but they are natural too. There is no clipped hair. Nor is there is no non-hairiness. Basically, these legs are sexy.

These legs (above) are cool because there's more suggested than what is actually seen. Basically these legs suggest that around the back there is a very cute ass lurking. I like that. I also like the vein in the left-hand corner of abs.

Then, I am sent these...

These don't really scream bulk but there is sturdiness. These legs also suggest an enormous willy which kinda cancels out a lack of a quads. (The suggestion of willy-XL is thanks to the over-size Calvins. I cannot confirm these allegations).

Then we have a late re-entry.

These very defined calves are sent in. They show some ample hairyness (nice) but most importantly they show bulk.

Finally these legs belong to yours truly. While I am happy to admit that in the quads stage, I may be lacking however, in the calves stage I surge ahead.

Maybe I need to snap some better pics?

So whose do you like? Whose is the sexiest? Leave a comment and let me know. (Listen, I know this all a load of bollocks - a body counts for nothing when the brain is as flat as a pancake...innit?)